Competitor research

Compare named competitors using dated, cited observations. The planned outcome helps you make a decision while retaining what was and was not actually researched.

Freeze the comparison scope

Provide competitor identities or an approved discovery scope, relevant product/offer categories, markets and the comparison question. A named set is not the entire competitive landscape.

Resolve aliases and duplicate domains before attributing evidence to a competitor.

Produce a reviewable comparison

Retain company/product identities, source references, observation time, measured attributes, gaps and contradictions. Mark inferred strategy or positioning as analysis rather than source fact.

For example, a competitor's advertised delivery promise can be compared with yours as a public claim, not proof of its actual fulfillment performance.

Keep history meaningful

Each refresh should retain its scope and prior observations. A changed website is evidence of a change, not automatic proof that the business changed every policy. Saved result retrieval should not trigger hidden reacquisition.

Availability

The business API is planned. Research does not authorize copying protected content, disparaging claims, outreach or automatic catalog/Store changes. Review proposed conclusions before using them in customer-facing material.